Jeonghyun Woo

JEDEC has introduced the Per Row Activation Counting (PRAC) framework for DDR5 and future DRAMs to enable precise counting of DRAM row activations. PRAC enables a holistic mitigation of Rowhammer attacks even at ultra-low Rowhammer thresholds. PRAC uses an Alert Back-Off (ABO) protocol to request the memory controller to issue Rowhammer mitigation requests. However, recent PRAC implementations are either insecure or impractical. For example, Panopticon, the inspiration for PRAC, is rendered insecure if implemented per JEDEC’s PRAC specification. On the other hand, the recent UPRAC proposal is impractical since it needs oracular knowledge of the ‘top-N’ activated DRAM rows that require mitigation. This paper provides the first secure, scalable, and practical RowHammer solution using the PRAC framework. The crux of our proposal is the design of a priority-based service queue (PSQ) for mitigations that prioritizes pending mitigations based on activation counts to avoid the security risks of prior solutions. This provides principled security using the reactive ABO protocol. Furthermore, we co-design our PSQ, with opportunistic mitigation on Refresh Management (RFM) operations and proactive mitigation during refresh (REF), to limit the performance impact of ABO-based mitigations. QPRAC provides secure and practical RowHammer mitigation that scales to Rowhammer thresholds as low as 71 while incurring a 0.8% slowdown for benign workloads, which further reduces to 0% with proactive mitigations.

RowHammer vulnerabilities pose a significant threat to modern DRAM-based systems, where rapid activation of DRAM rows can induce bit-flips in neighboring rows. To mitigate this, state-of-the-art host-side RowHammer mitigations typically rely on shared counters or tracking structures. While these optimizations benefit benign applications, they are vulnerable to Performance Attacks (Perf-Attacks), where adversaries exploit shared structures to reduce DRAM bandwidth for co-running benign applications by increasing DRAM accesses for RowHammer counters or triggering repetitive refreshes required for the early reset of structures, significantly degrading performance. In this paper, we propose secure hashing mechanisms to thwart adversarial attempts to capture the mapping of shared structures. We propose DAPPER, a novel low-cost tracker resilient to Perf-Attacks even at ultra-low RowHammer thresholds. We first present a secure hashing template in the form of DAPPER-S. We then develop DAPPER-H, an enhanced version of DAPPER-S, incorporating double-hashing, novel reset strategies, and mitigative refresh techniques. Our security analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of DAPPER-H against both RowHammer and Perf-Attacks. Experiments with 57 workloads from SPEC2006, SPEC2017, TPC, Hadoop, MediaBench, and YCSB show that, even at an ultra-low RowHammer threshold of 500, DAPPER-H incurs only a 0.9% slowdown in the presence of Perf-Attacks while using only 96KB of SRAM per 32GB of DRAM memory.

As Dynamic Random Access Memories (DRAM) scale, they are becoming increasingly susceptible to Row Hammer. By rapidly activating rows of DRAM cells (aggressor rows), attackers can exploit inter-cell interference through Row Hammer to flip bits in neighboring rows (victim rows). A recent work, called Randomized Row-Swap (RRS), proposed proactively swapping aggressor rows with randomly selected rows before an aggressor row can cause Row Hammer. Our paper observes that RRS is neither secure nor scalable. We first propose the ‘Juggernaut attack pattern’ that breaks RRS in under 1 day. Juggernaut exploits the fact that the mitigative action of RRS, a swap operation, can itself induce additional target row activations, defeating such a defense. Second, this paper proposes a new defense Secure Row-Swap mechanism that avoids the additional activations from swap (and unswap) operations and protects against Juggernaut. Furthermore, this paper extends Secure Row-Swap with attack detection to defend against even future attacks. While this provides better security, it also allows for securely reducing the frequency of swaps, thereby enabling Scalable and Secure Row-Swap. The Scalable and Secure Row-Swap mechanism provides years of Row Hammer protection with 3.3X lower storage overheads as compared to the RRS design. It incurs only a 0.7% slowdown as compared to a not-secure baseline for a Row Hammer threshold of 1200.

The continuous scaling-down of the dynamic random access memory (DRAM) manufacturing process has made it possible to improve DRAM density. However, it makes small DRAM cells susceptible to electromagnetic interference between nearby cells. Unless DRAM cells are adequately isolated from each other, the frequent switching access of some cells may lead to unintended bit flips in adjacent cells. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as RowHammer. It is often considered a security issue because unusually frequent accesses to a small set of rows generated by malicious attacks can cause bit flips. Such bit flips may also be caused by general applications. Although several solutions have been proposed, most approaches either incur excessive area overhead or exhibit limited prevention capabilities against maliciously crafted attack patterns. Therefore, the goals of this study are (1) to mitigate RowHammer, even when the number of aggressor rows increases and attack patterns become complicated, and (2) to implement the method with a low area overhead.We propose a robust hardware-based protection method for RowHammer attacks with a low hardware cost called HammerFilter, which employs a modified version of the counting bloom filter. It tracks all attacking rows efficiently by leveraging the fact that the counting bloom filter is a space-efficient data structure, and we add an operation, HALF-DELETE, to mitigate the energy overhead. According to our experimental results, the proposed method can completely prevent bit flips when facing artificially crafted attack patterns (five patterns in our experiments), whereas state-of-the-art probabilistic solutions can only mitigate less than 56% of bit flips on average. Furthermore, the proposed method has a much lower area cost compared to existing counter-based solutions (40.6× better than TWiCe and 2.3× better than Graphene).